<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A boring post on SEO hypocrisy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/2010/04/23/a-boring-post-on-seo-hyprocrisy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/2010/04/23/a-boring-post-on-seo-hyprocrisy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/2010/04/23/a-boring-post-on-seo-hyprocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-125190</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/?p=299#comment-125190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have come across many sites offering paid links one of the most recent is 10,000 permanent links for $99? You know this doesn&#039;t sound right so really it isn&#039;t. I understand the point you are trying to get across mark and im not sure if these other raspberries do.

There&#039;s no need to call me a plum either, you raspberry. - Cracks me up.

If you say pretty please do you get a do follow link?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have come across many sites offering paid links one of the most recent is 10,000 permanent links for $99? You know this doesn&#8217;t sound right so really it isn&#8217;t. I understand the point you are trying to get across mark and im not sure if these other raspberries do.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no need to call me a plum either, you raspberry. &#8211; Cracks me up.</p>
<p>If you say pretty please do you get a do follow link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/2010/04/23/a-boring-post-on-seo-hyprocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-111487</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 15:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/?p=299#comment-111487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would be really nice if we could move on from this as Mark has suggested and start the comments again with new thoughts and feeling and ideas on this....I&#039;m a newbie at all this so I want ideas not rants to chew over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be really nice if we could move on from this as Mark has suggested and start the comments again with new thoughts and feeling and ideas on this&#8230;.I&#8217;m a newbie at all this so I want ideas not rants to chew over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/2010/04/23/a-boring-post-on-seo-hyprocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-102348</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/?p=299#comment-102348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey kettle,

Can I ask what your view of a directory link is?

So I pay an SEO agency who then places my company website in a directory - by this definition

I&#039;ve paid them money
They&#039;ve got me an anchor text rich link

Therefore = paid link?

That&#039;s why I have a problem with the literal interpretation, yes.

The nofollow tag is used to control and mark 1) links you can&#039;t vouch for (usually ugc - such as these blog comments) and 2) links that are specifically paid for as an advertisment.

I don&#039;t see how they fall into either of those catergories.

As I&#039;ve made clear, this is my opinion and understanding of what Google is trying to produce within their guidelines and I&#039;ve had a lot of other SEOs agree with me - and some posting here that don&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey kettle,</p>
<p>Can I ask what your view of a directory link is?</p>
<p>So I pay an SEO agency who then places my company website in a directory &#8211; by this definition</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve paid them money<br />
They&#8217;ve got me an anchor text rich link</p>
<p>Therefore = paid link?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I have a problem with the literal interpretation, yes.</p>
<p>The nofollow tag is used to control and mark 1) links you can&#8217;t vouch for (usually ugc &#8211; such as these blog comments) and 2) links that are specifically paid for as an advertisment.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how they fall into either of those catergories.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve made clear, this is my opinion and understanding of what Google is trying to produce within their guidelines and I&#8217;ve had a lot of other SEOs agree with me &#8211; and some posting here that don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kettle</title>
		<link>http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/2010/04/23/a-boring-post-on-seo-hyprocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-102329</link>
		<dc:creator>Kettle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/?p=299#comment-102329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hang on.

This is your client.
Who pays you money.
Who you&#039;ve given a anchor text rich link to.
But it&#039;s not a paid link?

*rollseyes*




Why aren&#039;t they nofollow if they&#039;re not for seo purposes? It&#039;s /just/ a case study?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on.</p>
<p>This is your client.<br />
Who pays you money.<br />
Who you&#8217;ve given a anchor text rich link to.<br />
But it&#8217;s not a paid link?</p>
<p>*rollseyes*</p>
<p>Why aren&#8217;t they nofollow if they&#8217;re not for seo purposes? It&#8217;s /just/ a case study?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/2010/04/23/a-boring-post-on-seo-hyprocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-102320</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digeratimarketing.co.uk/?p=299#comment-102320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re kind of going around in circles here, aren&#039;t we? So, I guess we&#039;ll have to leave it at agreeing to disagree.

At the end of the day, it&#039;s very hard for me to accept your point of view, when you remain anonymous, as your opinion carries little creditability - the same with industry experts that you haven&#039;t named.

Door is always open for a Twitter/Email/Phone conversation if you feel it&#039;s productive, although it doesn&#039;t sound like we&#039;re going to change opinion - and you&#039;d have to reveal your identity!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re kind of going around in circles here, aren&#8217;t we? So, I guess we&#8217;ll have to leave it at agreeing to disagree.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, it&#8217;s very hard for me to accept your point of view, when you remain anonymous, as your opinion carries little creditability &#8211; the same with industry experts that you haven&#8217;t named.</p>
<p>Door is always open for a Twitter/Email/Phone conversation if you feel it&#8217;s productive, although it doesn&#8217;t sound like we&#8217;re going to change opinion &#8211; and you&#8217;d have to reveal your identity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
