Comments on: Last Chance For £10 – AutoStumble

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:50:29 +0000

@Eric

oh right. Digerati is banned on Stumble – not actually because of AutoStumble It was banned because somebody submitted the post about AutoStumble to SU then obviously loads of hardcore users don’t like the idea and thumbed it down – SU bans sites when enough users have thumbed down

Still on 0 sites banned from AutoStumble usage then, woo!

By: Eric

Eric — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:29:28 +0000

@ Mark – I am talking about your site – digeratimarketing.co.uk – I tried to Stumble it and got -> “Banned Site

You cannot rate or comment on this website. It has been banned from StumbleUpon because the owner has been abusing our service, or has asked that their site not be included in StumbleUpon.”

By: Joe Manausa

Joe Manausa — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:16:09 +0000

Thanks Mark, that makes a lot of sense on the stumbles. What doesn’t jibe is the number of stumbles I make. I have now set it to 6 minutes, won’t that equate to 10 per hour?

By: Mark

Mark — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:51:05 +0000

Hi guys,

The queue is not actually empty, but we have set limits on when queue “chunks” are delivered to you.

This stops obvious footprints appearing and gives you the chance to stop stumbling if your content goes viral.

@Joe – Stumbles don’t appear on analytics, because you’re not actually getting a visitor – just a vote.

By: Joe Manausa

Joe Manausa — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:33:55 +0000

And, by the way, my analytics do not show but 27 stumbles have come in.